Courtroom interaction is often viewed as highly structured and rule-governed, yet research shows that interaction can sometimes be spontaneous, with defendants shifting topics, interrupting, or offering unsolicited comments. This study builds on discourse-based research by integrating Communication Accommodation Theory (CAT) and Conversation Analysis (CA) to investigate the interactional dynamics of (non)accommodation during cross-examination. Focusing on the widely publicized 2022 Depp v. Heard case, the analysis explores how Amber Heard and the attorney oriented to local actions, specifically how (non)accommodative behaviors were recognized, managed, and evaluated. Three key themes structured the analysis: the defendant's escalating use of hostile nonaccommodation practices, the attorney's responses to these practices, and the defendant's shift between accommodation and nonaccommodation during extended exchanges. CA reveals how (non)accommodation is interactionally produced and managed, shaping the trajectory of the exchange. Findings underscore the dynamic and context-sensitive nature of courtroom interactions, where reciprocal nonaccommodative behaviors amplify hostility. The study challenges prior quantitative CAT findings by demonstrating that coercive questioning did not consistently affect the length or quality of responses. It highlights how roles and context shape the management and perception of (non)accommodation in adversarial settings. This work advances the application of CAT and CA in legal discourse research and offers insights into how power, alignment, and control are negotiated in courtroom talk. Future research is encouraged to explore other factors influencing (non)accommodation, such as nonverbal behavior and the defendant's perceived social category.
Sultan et al. (Tue,) studied this question.