Coalition formation explores how to partition a set of \ (n\) agents into disjoint coalitions according to their preferences. We consider a cardinal utility model with an additively separable aggregation of preferences and study the online variant, where agents arrive in sequence. The goal is to achieve competitive social welfare. In the basic model, agents arrive in an arbitrary order and have to be assigned to coalitions immediately and irrevocably. There, the natural greedy algorithm is known to achieve an optimal competitive ratio, which heavily relies on the range of utilities. We complement this result by considering two related models. First, we study a model where agents arrive in a random order. We find that the competitive ratio of the greedy algorithm is \ ( (1n^{2}) \). In contrast, an alternative algorithm, which is based on alternating between waiting and greedy phases, can achieve a competitive ratio of \ ( (1n) \). Second, we relax the irrevocability of decisions by allowing the dissolution of coalitions into singleton coalitions. We achieve an asymptotically optimal competitive ratio of \ ( (1n) \) by drawing a close connection to a general model of online matching. Hence, in both models, we obtain a competitive ratio that removes the unavoidable utility dependencies in the basic model and essentially matches the best possible approximation ratio by polynomial-time algorithms.
Bullinger et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: