While the opportunity to provide medical care for elite-level professional and collegiate athletes is an honor and privilege, it does not come without a unique set of challenges. The team physician role continues to evolve and insight on today's climate of team physicians' care of elite athletes globally may be enlightening. As such, the purpose of this review is to provide a synopsis of the meeting's key points and present the results of the survey to better delineate the effect of the medicolegal risk involved in the care of elite athletes. An international and multidisciplinary group of experts on ACL injury and sports medicine were chosen to participate on a panel at the "2024 Freddie Fu Panther Sports Medicine Symposium" held at the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA on June 6, 2024. The international panel included orthopedic surgeons, primary care physicians, and scientists and focused on the medicolegal climate of sports medicine. Throughout the duration of the panel, a live questionnaire was provided to the audience, which included practitioners from 17 countries and 5 continents. The survey consisted of 8 "yes/no" questions. Several themes emerged from the discussion, including differing medicolegal consequences based on geographic location, changes to documentation in response to litigation risk, and increases in personal stressors to physicians. Of the 8 statements administered to the audience during the panel discussion, only 3 had greater than 50% agreement. These statements included changes to practice based on the medicolegal climate and the effects of defensive practice on physicians and patients alike. The risk of litigation in orthopedic sports medicine surgery varies greatly based on the geographic location of the practice and is perceived to affect both patient care and providers alike. As the assessment of medical professional liability risk arising from the care of elite athletes continues to evolve, discussion between physicians, athletes, agents, and teams/clubs should be patient-centered, multidisciplinary, and undertaken with absolute professionalism, strong communication, and thorough documentation.
Herman et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: