This paper compares and analyzes a selection of popular multilevel tests used for quick accreditation of English as a foreign language worldwide. The paper begins by stating the current need of accreditation of English language competence for both academic and professional matters. It then looks at their defining features and differences. After, the different pros and cons are analyzed looking especially at the need to diversify item types since the authors consider that even the most novel tests have a traditional construct that dates back many years. It also proposes new types of items. The paper concludes that a revision of the concept of language construct is necessary considering the specific uses of the language in the 21st century.
Laborda et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: