Public procurement plays a pivotal role in government operations, offering numerous advantages, including cost efficiency and transparency. However, several challenges, primarily stemming from corrupt practices by both public and private officials involved in procurement, have hindered its development. These challenges are particularly evident in countries like Nigeria, China, and Brazil, where corruption remains a critical issue in public procurement processes. This paper critically examines the challenges and developments surrounding anti-corruption measures in public procurement, focusing on Nigeria, China, and Brazil. It explores the existing anti-corruption frameworks in these countries, highlighting their strengths and limitations in ensuring transparency and accountability. While various measures have been implemented to combat corruption, they are often deemed inadequate to address the current issues. The study employs a doctrinal research methodology to assess the effectiveness of these anti-corruption efforts. In conclusion, the paper suggests that a more thorough review and strengthening of the existing anti-corruption measures could significantly improve transparency and accountability in public procurement processes, not only in the countries under review but globally.
Nnawulezi et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: