Background: Single-agent pembrolizumab represents a standard of care in the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) with a programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) of ≥50%. Real-world evidence is of increasing importance in oncology, as clinical trial inclusion criteria may not be truly reflective of the patient population seen in daily clinical practice. Methods: We performed a prospective–retrospective single-center study including 121 patients who received pembrolizumab as a first-line therapy for mNSCLC with a PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50%. Our aims were to make a comparison with published clinical trial results by assessing the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab monotherapy in our population. We collected patient demographics, clinical characteristics of the disease, and treatment outcomes, including efficacy and safety. Results: A total of 121 patients were included, with a median follow-up of 40.77 months. The median progression-free survival in the real world (rwPFS) was 20.73 months (95% CI 12.24–29.22), and the median overall survival (OS) was 29.30 months (95% CI 16.57–42.04). Immune-mediated adverse events (irAEs) occurred in 42% of patients, with serious events (grade 3 or more) occurring in 12%. ECOG PS 2, male gender, squamous histology, pleural and visceral metastases, and treatment with corticosteroids prior to initiation of pembrolizumab were found to be negative predictors for overall survival, while the occurrence of irAEs was the predictor of longer survival. Conclusions: This study provides further real-world insights into the efficacy of pembrolizumab in a heterogeneous patient population with advanced NSCLC in a single center in Serbia. It also confirmed the value of good ECOS PS and the occurrence of irAEs as predictors of favorable outcomes.
Djordjevic et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: