The paper explores the universal validity of the Oedipus complex in different cultures, particularly in Asia, and discusses the role of psychoanalysis as an anchor in chaotic times. The author delves into the objections raised by Asian cultures to the universal validity of the Oedipus complex. They provide examples from Indian, Chinese, and Japanese myths that challenge Freud's concept. The author argues that these myths and cultural variations are not antipodes to the Oedipus complex but rather cultural variants of a universal triangularity. The Eastern myths suggest that the early mother-child relationship plays a central role in cultural development and assigns women a significant role, contrary to Freud's views. Furthermore, the author challenges the notion of cultural identity between the West and the East as incommensurable. The paper concludes by discussing the need for psychoanalysis to address the individual and social turns against triangularity.
Tomas Plaenkers (Sun,) studied this question.