This manuscript investigates the applicability and behavior of the Generalized Extreme Value (GEV) distribution in flood frequency analysis, comparing it with the Pearson III and Wakeby distributions. Traditional approaches often rely on a limited set of statistical distributions and estimation techniques, which may not adequately capture the behavior of extreme events. The study focuses on four hydrometric stations in Romania, analyzing maximum discharges associated with rare and very rare events. The research employs seven parameter estimation methods: the method of ordinary moments (MOM), the maximum likelihood estimation (MLE), the L-moments, the LH-moments, the probability-weighted moments (PWMs), the least squares method (LSM), and the weighted least squares method (WLSM). Results indicate that the GEV distribution, particularly when using L-moments, consistently provides more reliable predictions for extreme events, reducing biases compared to MOM. Compared to the Wakeby distribution for an extreme event (T = 10,000 years), the GEV distribution produced smaller deviations than the Pearson III distribution, namely +7.7% (for the Danube River, Giurgiu station), +4.9% (for the Danube River, Drobeta station), and +35.3% (for the Ialomita River). In the case of the Siret River, the Pearson III distribution generated values closer to those obtained by the Wakeby distribution, being 36.7% lower than those produced by the GEV distribution. These results support the use of L-moments in national hydrological guidelines for critical infrastructure design and highlight the need for further investigation into non-stationary models and regionalization techniques.
Anghel et al. (Fri,) studied this question.