This study evaluates the influence of fiber type, geometry, and interfacial behavior on the physical and mechanical performance of cementitious composites reinforced with recycled pulp from beverage cartons (RPBC), bamboo fiber (BF), and eucalyptus fiber (EF) as the sole reinforcing agents. The BF was rounded in shape and had the highest aspect ratio, while the ribbon-shaped EF exhibited the highest tensile strength index. The RPBC fibers were fibrillated and the shortest, with a ribbon shape. Flexural strength results showed that RPBCC achieved a maximum strength that was 47.6% higher than the control specimen (0% fiber), outperforming both BF- and EF-reinforced counterparts. This superior performance is attributed to the higher fibrillation level of the ribbon-shaped RPBC fibers, which promoted better fiber–matrix bonding. As the fiber content increased, the bulk density of EFC and BFC decreased linearly, while RPBC composites showed only a modest decrease in density. Porosity steadily increased in EFC and BFC, whereas a non-linear trend was observed in RPBCC, likely due to its unique morphology and fibrillation. Conversely, EFC exhibited significantly higher maximum fracture toughness (3600 J/m2 at 10 wt.%) compared to PBFCC (1600 J/m2 at 14 wt.%) and BFC (1400 J/m2 at 14 wt.%). This enhancement is attributed to extensive fiber pullout mechanisms and increased energy absorption during crack propagation. Overall, all composite types demonstrated flexural strength values above 4 MPa, placing them in the Grade I category. Those reinforced with 10–14% RPBC exhibited strengths of 11–12 MPa, categorizing them as Grade II according to ASTM C1186-02.
Xaysombath et al. (Thu,) studied this question.