This study uses Michel Foucault's idea of panopticism as a theoretical framework to examine how Josh Malerman's Bird Box portrays dystopian control and surveillance. A post-apocalyptic world inhabited by nameless creatures serves as the setting for the story. The mysterious creatures force the characters to avoid looking at them, as a mere glimpse of these creatures would make them suicidal. This study investigates how Josh Malerman's Bird Box depicts dystopian control and surveillance using Foucault's ideas of panopticism. Foucault's panopticon, which represents the centralised authority of a dystopian regime, stands for continuous monitoring and control. The creatures create a sensation of perpetual vulnerability by acting as a panoptic force that is never seen but is always present. By reversing the logic of vision, the blindfolds represent the panoptic gaze, in which being "seen" by creatures leads to destruction, while not seeing becomes a means of survival. The residents of Riverbridge especially Malorie, create a special framework of self-regulation and imposed isolation by severely restricting their sensory experiences, especially vision, in order to protect their lives and sanity. The characters' self-imposed blindness and seclusion, which are signs of obedience, suggest an internalization of control similar to that of Foucauldian regulation. This research also clarifies how dystopian fiction examines the subtle yet ubiquitous ways power impacts individual behavior and social consciousness by connecting Malerman's terrifying tale to Foucault's theories. It also highlights how Bird Box reflects concerns about autonomy, surveillance, and the loss of agency in regulated settings that exist in the real world. Keywords: Panopticism, Dystopia, Surveillance, Foucault.
Fatima et al. (Mon,) studied this question.