To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the Roche SARS-CoV-2 & Flu A/B Rapid Antigen Test at the point of care. Prospective diagnostic accuracy study. 17 primary care practices in England. 500 individuals with symptoms consistent with possible SARS-CoV-2 or influenza infection identified upon presentation to primary care or via medical note review. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values, compared to a laboratory reference standard of real-time reverse transcription PCR, using samples collected using a combined nasal and oropharyngeal swab. Of 481 participants with available index and reference test results, 5.6% (27/481) were reference standard-positive for SARS-CoV-2, 11.4% (55/481) for Influenza A and 1.9% (9/481) for Influenza B. The sensitivity of the antigen test to detect SARS-CoV-2 was 70.4% (19/27, 95% CI 49.6-86.2%) and specificity was 99.3% (451/454, 95%CI 98.1-99.9%). For Influenza A, sensitivity was 29.1% (16/55, 95% CI 17.6-42.9%) and specificity 98.6% (420/426, 97.0-99.5%), and for Influenza B, sensitivity was 22.2% (2/9, 2.8-60.0%) and specificity 98.1% (463/472, 96.4-99.1%). In a primary care population of symptomatic individuals, the assay was highly specific and had moderate sensitivity to detect SARS-CoV-2, but did not detect the majority of influenza infections. ISRCTN14226970.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Thomas Fanshawe
University of Oxford
Sharon Tonner
University of Oxford
Philip J. Turner
University of Oxford
PLoS ONE
University of Oxford
Imperial College London
NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Fanshawe et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68c1bd2a54b1d3bfb60edfba — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0329611
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: