This paper explores the aesthetic and philosophical legacy of Rabindranath Tagore in shaping the thematic and stylistic features of postcolonial fiction. It examines how Tagore’s contemplative humanism, his synthesis of the spiritual and political, and his emphasis on inner freedom continue to resonate in the works of key postcolonial writers. Postcolonial fiction, particularly in South Asia and Africa, frequently engages with themes of cultural hybridity, ethical subjectivity, and resistance to colonial rationality—concerns that were central to Tagore’s vision of literature and the nation. Writers such as Chinua Achebe, Amitav Ghosh, and Arundhati Roy echo Tagore’s critique of modernity and his search for a moral and artistic cosmopolitanism. The study adopts a comparative literary analysis method, closely reading selected novels from postcolonial authors alongside key texts by Tagore, including his essays, letters, and fiction. It combines textual interpretation with historical contextualization to trace aesthetic and ideological continuities. The research finds that Tagore’s influence is evident not only in thematic preoccupations—such as the spiritual crisis of modernity, the ethics of nationalism, and the re-imagination of the self—but also in narrative form. The paper reveals that Tagore functions as a silent interlocutor within postcolonial fiction, offering an alternative genealogy of modernism that challenges Eurocentric literary lineages. His legacy informs a mode of writing that privileges introspection, cultural pluralism, and moral ambiguity. By recovering Tagore’s aesthetic and ethical framework as foundational to postcolonial literature, this study positions him as a vital precursor to later literary efforts that seek to express the complexities of decolonization and nationhood. Tagore’s inner vision of the nation—as an imaginative and ethical construct—continues to animate and deepen the narrative possibilities of postcolonial fiction
M et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: