Abstract Background Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has improved diabetes management, yet not all patients benefit equally. We previously developed a predictive calculator using clinical and socioeconomic variables to estimate the likelihood of achieving optimal control after CGM initiation. This study prospectively validated the calculator in a real-world cohort. Methods A single-center prospective study included 102 adults with type 1 or pancreatic diabetes using multiple daily insulin injections, followed for three months. Optimal control was defined as time in range (TIR, 70–180 mg/dL) > 70% and time below range (TBR, <70 mg/dL) < 4%. Model performance was assessed using ROC analysis and correlation tests. Results Of 102 participants, 85 completed follow-up (median age: 53.6 years; 48% women; median diabetes duration: 12.9 years; baseline HbA1c: 7.6%). Thirty-three (38.8%) achieved optimal control. The calculator showed moderate discrimination (AUC = 0.639) and significant correlations with TIR ( p = 0.230, p = 0.023) and time in tight range (TITR, 70–140 mg/dL) ( p = 0.271, p = 0.019). Overall accuracy was 61.9%, lower than in the original cohort. Smoking predicted non-completion ( p = 0.038). Conclusions The calculator shows moderate accuracy in predicting glycemic control and TITR after CGM initiation. CGM adherence remains a challenge, warranting further study in publicly funded healthcare settings.
Sebastián‐Valles et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: