Pancasila, the five core principles proclaimed at the founding of the modern Indonesian nation-state, has served as a unifying concept and the bedrock of Indonesians shared nationhood. This paper traces the evolution of Pancasila as the enduring state ideology from its consolidation during the Soekarno era and sweeping expansion under the New Order regime to its decline and subsequent revival during and after the democratic transition. I argue that Pancasila is central to Indonesias unity in diversity. It emerged as what scholars aptly describe as an empty signifier, an inclusive and all-encompassing ideological vehicle that leaves room for diverse and often competing interpretations. This interpretive flexibility allows religious, political, and cultural groups within Indonesian society to pursue distinct goals under the banner of Pancasila without deviating from or undermining the states ideological unity. It facilitates the formation of imagined communities, through which divergent views and interests are represented, reconciled, and legitimized by the Pancasila state. The imagination is both singular and plural: while groups such as secular nationalists, conservative Muslims, New Order elites, democrats, and Javanists build solidarity within their respective, self-contained communities, they collectively submit to and willingly adhere to a unified and sovereign Indonesian nationhood in which different voices are acknowledged and accommodated.
C. H. ZHANG (Fri,) studied this question.