Motivation: Current bladder cancer (BCa) evaluation techniques require contrast agent, which is contraindicated in some patients. Goal(s): We aimed to assess the potential value of arterial spin labeling (ASL) for evaluating BCa. Approach: We conducted ASL scans of patients with BCa and obtained corresponding perfusion values (bladder blood flow BBF) of the bladder lesions. We collected pathological and immunohistochemical information, dynamic contrast-enhanced quantitative parameters, and Ktrans values. Results: BBF and Ktrans were moderately positively correlated. BBF values for high-grade urothelial carcinoma, muscle invasion and Ki-67 >25% were higher than those for low-grade urothelial carcinoma, non-muscle invasion and Ki-67 ≤25% (P<0.05). Impact: Non-invasive and quantitative arterial spin labeling is a valuable technique for evaluating bladder cancer because it enables quantifying tumor perfusion and offers insights into the physiological and pathological processes.
Guo et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: