Abstract Background Pogostemon cablin (P. cablin) is a valuable medicinal plant used in traditional medicine and the fragrance industry, but quality control is challenging due to inconsistent stem-to-leaf ratios and frequent essential oil adulteration. Objective This study compares volatile components in different parts (aerial parts, stems, leaves) and essential oil of P. cablin to support quality control (not less than 20% leaf) and its rational use. Methods Volatile components in 21 batches of aerial parts, stems, leaves, and 13 batches of essential oils were analyzed using GC-MS. Multivariate curve resolution-alternating least squares (MCR-ALS) was used for resolving co-eluted peaks, and chemical fingerprinting with chemometric techniques like hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA), principal component analysis (PCA), partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA), and orthogonal partial least squares discrimination analysis (OPLS-DA) was applied. Results Volatile profiling identified 56, 47, 28, and 45 components in the aerial parts, leaves, stems, and essential oil of P. cablin, respectively. MCR-ALS resolved ten major volatile compounds to create chemical fingerprints for each analytical sample type. Quantitative analysis showed higher patchouli alcohol in leaves (12.47 mg/g) compared to stems (2.05 mg/g), while stems had more pogostone (2.71 mg/g vs. 1.40 mg/g in leaves). Aerial parts and essential oil showed significant compositional differences. Based on the results of qualitative and quantitative analysis, chemometric methods, including HCA, PCA, PLS-DA and OPLS-DA, clearly differentiated the four types of P. cablin analytical samples. Conclusions Significant differences in volatile components across P. cablin parts and its essential oil support quality control (not less than 20% leaf) and rational use. Highlights This study is the first to use MCR-ALS and other chemometrics for qualitative and quantitative analysis of P. cablin parts and essential oils, aiding quality control.
Wang et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: