Background: Blood-based comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP), a form of liquid biopsy, is often used for biliary tract cancer (BTC) when tissue-based CGP (tissue CGP) is unavailable, despite lower detection rates. This study explored factors linked to detecting actionable genomic alterations to optimize its use. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed BTC cases in Japan’s C-CAT (June 2019–January 2025), restricting panel comparisons to FoundationOne® CDx (F1; n = 5019) and FoundationOne® Liquid CDx (F1L; n = 1550). Missing covariates were handled by multiple imputations (m = 20). Between-panel balance used 1:1 propensity-score matching (caliper 0.2). Outcomes were modeled with logistic regression. Targets included MSI-H, TMB-H, FGFR2/RET/NTRK fusions, BRAF V600E, KRAS G12C, IDH1 mutations, and ERBB2 amplification. An exploratory analysis stratified results by the number of prespecified enrichment factors (0–4). Liquid biopsy was performed using plasma-based comprehensive genomic profiling assays (FoundationOne® Liquid). Results: Missingness was low; after matching (n = 1549 per group) covariates were well balanced (all |SMD| ≤ 0.05). Detection of any actionable alteration was lower with F1L than F1 (16.8% vs. 24.8%; OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.49–0.75; p < 0.001). F1L also had lower TMB-H (OR 0.62, 0.43–0.90; p = 0.01) and ERBB2 amplification (OR 0.42, 0.31–0.57; p < 0.001), with no significant differences for MSI-H, IDH1, KRAS G12C, or BRAF V600E. Within F1L, non-perihilar location (OR 2.05), liver (1.90), lymph-node (1.41), and lung metastases (1.52) predicted detection of actionable genomic alterations. F1L detection increased from 5.8% (zero factors) to 32.8% (four factors), approximating tissue at three factors. Conclusions: The utility of liquid biopsy can be maximized by carefully selecting samples on the basis of conditions that increase the detection rate.
Shimizu et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: