Background: Atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor (ATRT) is a highly aggressive, rare pediatric central nervous system malignancy. Prognostic factors for optimizing risk stratification and management in a large uniformly treated cohort are lacking. Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study analyzing clinical and outcome data for 100 newly diagnosed ATRT patients aged <18 years treated at the Children’s Cancer Hospital, Egypt, from 2008 to 2022. They were treated uniformly as per the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute modified IRS-III protocol. Molecular subgroups (MYC, SHH, and TYR) were determined via a DNA methylation array for patients who had sufficient DNA material available for the methylation analysis. Treatment toxicities were graded per the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0. Results: The median age at diagnosis was 1.88 years (IQR 0.99, 3.01); 28% were under 1 year of age, 45% were between 1 and 3 years old, and 26% were above 3 years of age. At diagnosis, 39% of patients had metastatic disease. A total of 60% of patients had gross residual disease following surgical excision. In multivariable analysis, age < 1 year and metastatic disease had a significant impact on event-free survival (EFS) (p = 0.047 and p = 0.002, respectively); however, only metastatic disease had a significantly negative effect on overall survival (OS) and cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) (p = 0.002 for OS and p < 0.001 for CIR). DNA methylation was performed for 69 patients who were classified as having a TYR (n = 13), SHH (n = 34), MYC (n = 17), or non-ATRT diagnosis (n = 5). In the cohort of the 64 patients with ATRT defined by methylation, no significant survival differences were observed. Treatment-related deaths were reported in 28% of our studied group. Gram-negative septicemia was the most common cause of toxic death. The 5-year EFS and OS of the whole cohort were 12% and 13%, respectively. Conclusions: In this cohort, no significant survival differences were observed among the methylation subgroups. The higher treatment-related mortality in our cohort compared to the original protocol’s toxic-related deaths suggested that intensive and lengthy chemotherapy regimens may need modification for our population. The need for a short intensified approach, including a limited induction cycle followed by an intensified high-dose consolidation therapy, may be more appropriate for our patients with low socioeconomic status to avoid a repeated and prolonged course of protracted neutropenia.
Ismail et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: