Objective To synthesise data evaluating the diagnostic utility of prostate‐specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in intermediate‐risk prostate cancer (PCa), as its role in intermediate‐risk PCa remains uncertain. Methods A systematic search was conducted for studies evaluating PSMA PET/CT in primary staging of newly diagnosed European Association of Urology (EAU)/National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) intermediate‐risk, or Gleason Score 7 (International Society of Urological Pathology ISUP Grade Group GG 2–3) PCa. The primary outcome was overall positive scans (lymph nodes or distant metastases). We also secondarily analysed diagnostic accuracy measuring sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. Results In total, 16 studies reported positivity rates ranging from 2.2% to 50.0% in intermediate‐risk PCa. A pooled analysis of 13 studies found a PSMA PET/CT positivity rate of 9% (95% confidence interval CI 6–11%). In ISUP GG 2 PCa, positivity ranged from 2.2% to 21.4%, compared to 13.6–33.3% in ISUP GG 3 PCa (across two studies). The overall nodal and metastatic sensitivity of PSMA PET/CT was low in intermediate‐risk men, 33% (95% CI 14–60%). Limitations included small sample sizes, retrospective designs, and limited histopathological confirmation. Conclusion For primary staging in intermediate‐risk PCa PSMA PET/CT showed a low yield. Limited data exist to guide its use in favourable vs unfavourable subgroups. Robust, prospective studies are needed to define its role in clinical decision‐making, further prognostic benefits, and to inform future guidelines.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Jacinta Bonaddio
Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia
Jonathon Carll
Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia
Renu Eapen
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
BJU International
The University of Melbourne
The Royal Melbourne Hospital
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Bonaddio et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68dd91cbfe798ba2fc4988b1 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.70015
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: