Corruption remains a significant challenge in Indonesia, as it undermines public trust and hampers effective governance. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of public administration in combating corruption, focusing on transparency, accountability, collaborative governance, and anti-corruption culture. Using a qualitative approach and case study methodology, insights from 22 key experts and secondary data were synthesis ed to identify systemic challenges and propose solutions. The findings reveal that complex bureaucratic structures, weak accountability mechanisms, and limited community involvement perpetuate corruption. This study highlights the transformative potential of e-government systems, citizen participation, and robust oversight in reducing corruption. An anti-corruption model integrating four theoretical frameworks - Public Administration, Accountability, Collaborative Governance, and Corruption - is proposed to promote transparency, foster integrity, and strengthen institutional capacity. The model emphasis es technology adoption, community involvement, and ethical reform to build a sustainable anti-corruption culture. Recommendations include enhancing the independence of supervisory bodies, increasing public access to information, and fostering stakeholder collaboration to ensure clean and effective governance. While this study provides valuable insights, its qualitative nature limits its generalis ability, and further research incorporating quantitative approaches is recommended.
Azhari Aziz Samudra (Sat,) studied this question.