The study aimed to comprehensively examine the functioning of the international human rights protection system and identify its strengths and weaknesses. The methodological basis of the study was formed by formal legal, comparative legal, historical and legal, dialectical, systemic and structural-functional methods. The study provided a comprehensive analysis of the regulatory and institutional framework for the functioning of the international human rights protection system based on the study of key international legal acts, case law of international judicial and monitoring bodies, and scientific sources. The study identified the main achievements and problematic aspects in international human rights mechanisms in ensuring effective access to justice, proper investigation of violations and the effectiveness of control procedures. Based on the analysis, the study substantiated the role of the international human rights protection system in ensuring the rule of law and guaranteeing fundamental rights and freedoms of every individual. At the same time, the study proved the need to further improve and strengthen certain institutional and procedural elements of this system to increase its efficiency and ability to withstand new global challenges. The study emphasised the need to unite the efforts of the international community to strengthen the effectiveness of international human rights mechanisms, bring them in line with modern standards and realities, and ensure their full implementation at the level of national legal systems. The study demonstrated that only through coordinated and systematic cooperation of states, international organisations, and civil society institutions can real progress be made in human dignity and protection of the rights of every person on a global scale
Dashkovska et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: