Widely distributed cross-sectional surveys remain a valuable research tool; however, they are also vulnerable to fraud in the form of “bots” (automated respondents) and humans completing a survey multiple times or when they are not eligible. Often, “infiltration” by such fraudulent responses is only noted and addressed after data collection has started. Here we present a tutorial based on the literature and our experience from a large survey of video game behaviour. We outline an iterative process consisting of automated and manual detection techniques with practical suggestions for customization and implementation in other research. By proactively considering how to detect and respond to fraud, researchers can have greater confidence in the integrity of their data, preserve limited resources, and minimize burden from post hoc fraud identification.
Raugh et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: