Abstract Three main areas of conflict in foresters' thinking with regard to outdoor recreation are defined and discussed. The main functional areas for decision and action in forest recreation are presented. The implications of the defined conflicts and the functional needs for solving outdoor recreation problems are presented. It is concluded that a different educational approach is needed for foresters interested in the recreational aspects of forestry and that instead of worrying about leadership, foresters should be worried about lack of adequate cooperation from other disciplines.
Gregersen et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: