Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Aims This audit aimed to evaluate current communication standards at a DGH (based on inpatient feedback) and assess the alignment with NICE Guidelines for improving the experience of care in adult NHS-services. The standards assessed included: providing clear information on diagnosis, oral and written communication, and communication in the presence of family or next of kin. Methods Inpatient feedback on surgical wards was collected to assess guideline adherence, with a pre-intervention survey designed to assess opinions before implementing an intervention. Two assessment cycles were conducted, with 12 responses in Cycle 1 (1-15 Nov 2023) and 13 responses in Cycle 2 (16-30 Nov 2023). The intervention included providing clear written information on imaging results and ongoing plans, and encouraging patients to use an information sheet throughout their admission, which could also be relayed to family members. Results Pre-intervention data revealed a diverse age distribution, predominantly in the 55-64 age group. Understanding of diagnosis varied pre-intervention but showed improvements post-intervention. Post-intervention, the majority (n=9) felt the information was appropriately pitched. Thirteen respondents received accessible information, finding the universally distributed information sheet helpful. A written response highlighted its utility in explaining clinical information to families. Healthcare professionals received improved 'clarity' and 'helpfulness' ratings post intervention, indicating positive outcomes. Conclusions Effective communication is integral to exceptional patient care. This audit underscores the potential to enhance patient understanding, alleviate concerns, and improve communication in surgical settings. The intervention, a simple information sheet, proved effective and emphasised the need for accessible, clear and standardised patient communication.
Dinarvand et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: