An Audit Of Post Fall Medical Reviews In Older Hospital Inpatients

Abstract Background After an older person falls in hospital, the post-fall medical review is critical to assess injury and to put a plan in place to prevent further falls. We performed an audit to assess the post fall medical review and management of patients ≥65 years in a large university teaching hospital compared to national standard “Service User Falls: A Practical Guide for Review” and NICE Guidelines. Methods In a consecutive cohort of patients with falls, the post-fall medical review note was examined for crucial details from the history (mechanism, head/hip strike, loss of consciousness, pain) and examination (confusion, vital signs, joint assessment). In addition, we audited if there was an indication for CT Brain and compared to NICE criteria. Results 49 post fall medical review notes were audited (Mean age 79 years, range 66-96). 27% of patients who fell had a CT Brain. 6% (3/49) of patients who fell met NICE criteria for CT Brain, but it was not performed. Conclusion A significant proportion of post fall medical reviews omit important details that could help diagnostically and to inform a plan to prevent further falls. There is limited guidance for clinicians as to when to order a CT Brain for inpatient falls. We plan to introduce a post fall medical review pro forma/checklist and to standardise a CT Brain decision tool. We will then re-audit post introduction of these to assess for quality improvement.