Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Highlights•PTS has no prognostic impact on patients with BRAFmt mCRC.•The prognostic impact of PTS may vary between sexes in BRAFmt mCRC.•Patients with BRAFmt mCRC and left-sided primaries may benefit from first-line anti-EGFR-based therapy.AbstractBackgroundPrimary tumor (PT) sidedness is an established prognostic marker in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and has a predictive impact on the efficacy of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) antibody monoclonal antibody (mAb) in patients with RAS wild-type mCRC. This investigation focuses on patients with BRAFV600E-mutated (BRAFmt) mCRC and examines the efficacy of anti-EGFR mAbs in relation to primary tumor sidedness (PTS).Patient and methodsThis pooled analysis was carried out using individual patient data from five randomized studies in the first-line setting of mCRC. The population of interest was limited to patients with BRAFmt mCRC and known PTS. For analysis, treatment was stratified into two groups: those treated with anti-EGFR mAbs and those without. Dichotomous variables, such as overall response rate and objective response rate (ORR), were compared using chi-square or Fisher's exact test. Time-to-event endpoints progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method, log-rank test, and Cox regression. An interaction test was carried out via Cox regression.ResultsA total of 102 patients with BRAFmt mCRC were identified. The type of targeted therapy (anti-EGFR-based versus non-anti-EGFR) did not significantly impact the outcome. However, in patients with left-sided primary tumors, anti-EGFR mAb-based treatment, compared with non-anti-EGFR, was associated with a higher ORR (58% versus 34%; P 0.99), induced inferior PFS (HR 1.97; 95% CI 1.12-3.47; P = 0.02), and trended toward a worse OS (HR 1.76; 95% CI 0.99-3.13; P = 0.05).ConclusionThis analysis suggests that PTS has predictive value for the efficacy of anti-EGFR mAb in the first-line treatment of BRAFmt mCRC.
Alig et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: