Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Previous studies have been limited to giving one or two tasks to Large Language Models (LLMs) and involved a small number of evaluators within a single domain to evaluate the LLM’s answer. We assessed the proficiency of four LLMs by applying eight tasks and evaluating 32 results with 17 evaluators from diverse domains, demonstrating the significance of various tasks and evaluators on LLMs.
Kim et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: