Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Background: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is the second leading cause of mortality in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (1). However, is frequently underrecognized as presents a highly variable clinical course, ranging from subclinical ILD to rapid progression to pulmonary fibrosis. Although, RA-ILD may have a substantial impact on prognosis, there are insufficient data to inform evidence-based recommendations on screening. In a combined effort by expert rheumatologists and pulmonologists, a screening tool based on risk factors for RA-ILD have been recently proposed (2). However, this risk score has not been validated in clinical practice. Objectives: To evaluate risk factors and treatment in patients with RA-ILD in comparison with patients without ILD in a cohort of RA patients with targeted therapies and to examine different cut-off points for the screening tool to identify patients at risk to develop ILD. Methods: Cohort study from a single academic center of RA patients undergoing targeted therapies. Risk factors associated with the development of ILD and current treatment were compared between RA-ILD and RA-noILD patients. The proposed risk score based on sex, age, smoking status, RA duration, rheumatoid factor and anti–cyclic citrullinated protein antibodies was calculated and different cut-off values were explored to identify patients at risk for ILD on the basis of the best trade-off values between sensitivity and specificity from a ROC curve analysis. Results: A total of 688 patients with RA treated with targeted therapies were included in our cohort, 31 (4.5%) with RA-ILD. RA-ILD patients were elder at RA onset (54.9 vs 45.2, pConclusion: Prevalence of ILD in our cohort of patients with RA and targeted therapies was 4.5%. The risk score identified 36% patients at low risk, 9.5% at moderate risk, and 2.2% at high risk of subclinical RA-ILD. The use of screening tools could favor the early detection of subclinical ILD and assist rheumatologists in early intervention to improve the prognosis of RA-ILD. REFERENCES: 1 Kronzer VL, Huang W, et al. J Rheumatol. 2021 May;48(5):656–63. 2 Narváez J, Aburto M, et al. Reumatol Clínica. 2023 Feb;19(2):74–81. Acknowledgements: This work was supported by the following grants: PI20/00847, PI23/01226 and RD21/0002/0034 from Instituto de Salud Carlos III and co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund. Disclosure of Interests: None declared.
Castrejón et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: