Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Background Longer times between diagnosis and treatments of cancer patients have been estimated as effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, relatively few studies attempted to estimate actual delay to treatment at the patient level. Objective To assess changes in delays to first treatment and surgery among newly diagnosed patients with localized breast cancer (BC) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods We used data from the PAPESCO-19 multicenter cohort study, which included patients from 4 French comprehensive cancer centers. We measured the delay to first treatment as the number of days between diagnosis and the first treatment regardless of whether this was neoadjuvant chemotherapy or surgery. COVID-19 pandemic exposure was estimated with a composite index that considered both the severity of the pandemic and the level of lockdown restrictions. We ran generalized linear models with a log link function and a gamma distribution to model the association between delay and the pandemic. Results Of the 187 patients included in the analysis, the median delay to first treatment was 42 (IQR:32–54) days for patients diagnosed before and after the start of the 1 st lockdown (N = 99 and 88, respectively). After adjusting for age and centers of inclusion, a higher composite pandemic index (> = 50 V.S. <50) had only a small, non-significant effect on times to treatment. Longer delays were associated with factors other than the COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusion We found evidence of no direct impact of the pandemic on the actual delay to treatment among patients with localized BC.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ke Zhou
Anhui Medical University
Marie Robert
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1
Valérie Seegers
Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest
PLoS ONE
Centre Jean Perrin
Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest
Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Zhou et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68e6774bb6db643587600fd6 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304556
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: