Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The productivity and well-being of honey bee colonies are greatly influenced by the nutrients present in the hives. A study was conducted to evaluate different supplemental feeds on honey bee productive performance during dearth periods. Thirty colonies were grouped into five (four treatment groups and one control group) and each group contained three sub-groups (2 weak, 2 strong, and 2 very strong). Control groups were not given any supplementation. Treatment diets were T1 (50% sugar syrup + 14% roasted barley powder (beso) + 36% roasted spiced pea powder (Shiro) ), T2 (50% powder sugar + 14% white sorghum powder + 36% bakery yeast, T3 (50% powder sugar + 14% white sorghum powder + 36% skimmed milk powder), T4 (50% sugar syrup with infusion of stinging nettle and 1% kerefa + 50% white sorghum powder). Feed was given on the entrance sides. The performance of experimental colonies was measured every 21 days in two phases during the dry season (from 3₂₂021 to 27₄₂021) and the rainy season (from 28–7₂021 to 1₁0₂021). Feed intake, space (cm2) of pollen, nectar, and honey in the comb were measured using a frame-sized transparent grid meter. The study revealed significant differences (p<0. 0001) in all measured parameters among the various treatments. The diet provided by T4 showed the highest levels of crude protein (18. 15%) and carbohydrates (92. 15%), whereas the diet presented by T3 had the lowest crude protein content (6. 66%) and the diet offered by T1 had the lowest carbohydrate content (61. 91%). In general, colonies that received T4 showcased superior performance compared to others. They exhibited a feed intake of 98. 3%, a nectar area of 54. 3 cm2, a pollen area of 68. 7 cm2, a honey area of 311. 2 cm2, and a honey yield of 7 kg. Consequently, their net profit amounted to 51. 54 USD. On the other hand, the colonies that received T1 had the lowest performance indicators. They demonstrated a feed intake of only 54. 7%, a nectar area of 37. 6 cm2, a pollen area of 48. 8 cm2, a honey area of 254. 3 cm2, a honey yield of 2. 8 kg, and a net profit of 18. 81 USD. The significance of this study was to enable the beekeepers in realizing the effects of feed supplements on the productivity and profitability of honeybee colonies.
Amera et al. (Wed,) studied this question.