Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This study explores the effectiveness of ChatGPT as a tool for evaluating linguistic accuracy in second language (L2) writing, situated within the complexity, accuracy, and fluency (CAF) framework. By using the Cambridge Learner Corpus First Certificate in English (CLC FCE) dataset, an error-tagged learner corpus, it compares ChatGPT's performance to human evaluators and Grammarly in assessing errors or accuracy rates across 232 writing samples. The findings indicate a strong correlation between ChatGPT's assessments and human accuracy ratings, demonstrating its precision in automated assessments. In comparison to Grammarly, ChatGPT shows a closer alignment with human judgments and students' writing scores. Thus, ChatGPT can be a potential tool for enhancing efficiency in L2 research and L2 writing pedagogy.
Mizumoto et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: