Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Objective: To compare living wages and salaries at US residency programs. Summary Background Data: It is unknown how resident salary compares to living wages across the United States (US). Methods: Cross-sectional analysis of publicly available resident salary affordability from training centers with post-graduate-year (PGY)-1 through PGY-7 resident compensation for 2022-2023 was compared with the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Living-Wage Calculator. Resident salary to living wage ratios were calculated using PGY-4 salary for each family composition. Univariate and multivariable analysis of PGY-4 salary affordability was performed, accounting for proportion of expected living wages to taxes, transportation, housing, healthcare, childcare, and food, as well as unionization and state income-tax. Results: 118 residency programs, representing over 60% of US trainees, were included, 20 (17%) of which were unionized. Single-parent families were unable to earn a living wage until PGY-7. Residents with 1 child in 2-adult (single-income) and 2-adult (dual-income) families earn below living wages until PGY-5 and PGY-3, respectively. Residents with more than 1 child never earn a living wage. Multivariable regression analysis using PGY-4 salary: living wage ratios in single-child, 2-parent homes showed food expense and unionization status were consistent predictors of affordability. Unionization was associated with lower affordability pre-stipend, almost equivalent affordability post-stipend, and lower affordability post-stipend and union dues. Conclusions: Resident salaries often preclude residents with children from earning a living wage. Unionization is not associated with increased resident affordability in this cross-sectional analysis. All annual reimbursement data should be centrally compiled, and additional stipends should be considered for residents with children.
Liles et al. (Fri,) studied this question.