Characterization of conduction recovery and atrial electrophysiological properties after pulmonary vein isolation using pulsed field ablation

Abstract Background Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a relatively new technology for isolation of pulmonary veins in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Data addressing reasons for recurrent atrial fibrillation despite primarily successful pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using PFA are scarce, due to an up to date limited number of patients treated this way. Objective The aim of this study was to analyze electrophysiological characteristics of reconduction and / or left atrial substrate of patients referred to our center for Re-Do procedures for recurrent AF after an initial PVI using PFA. Methods 90 patients (mean age 66±9 years, 69 male (77%)) had been treated in our center from November 2021 to July 2023 with PVI using PFA. 9 (10%) of these patients were referred for Re-Do procedures. These were performed by radiofrequency ablation (RFA) using Carto system including high density mapping and high power / short duration (HPSD) ablation. We analyzed location of PV reconnection and low voltage areas (LVA) in the left atria. Results 7 out of 9 patients (77%) presented with reconnections of pulmonary veins. In one patient a single vein showed reconduction (RSPV), in 5 patients 2 veins were conducting (1x LSPV, 3x LIPV, 1 left sided common os (LCo), 1x RSPV, 3x RIPV). None of the patients showed 3 or 4 reconnected veins. Areas of reconduction in each vein were: LSPV 1x ridge, 1x posterior; LIPV 1x posterior, 1x anterior and posterior; LCo 1x posterior, RSPV 1x anterior, 2x carina, 1x anterior and posterior; RIPV 1x complete, 2x carina. In 7 patients a fibrotic atrial cardiomyopathy (FACM) was diagnosed via high density mapping of LVA’s. In 2 of these patients all 4 pulmonary veins were chronically isolated after the initial PVI. All patients except one (very small anterior LVA) with FACM ≥1 were treated with additional linear or encircling lesions according to the individual extent of the fibrotic areas. 2 patients had no LVA’s detectable. In one of those 2 patients 2 veins had reconnected. The other patient had chronically isolated veins (no proof of dormant conduction with adenosine) and no detectable non-PV-triggers under isoprenaline. Conclusion In the population of patients undergoing PVI using PFA in our center, only 10% had clinically relevant recurrences leading to the necessity of a Re-Do procedure. Most patients (77%) in this setting had reconnections of pulmonary veins. There is a tendency of posterior reconnections of the left pulmonary veins and reconnections of the carina of the right pulmonary veins, but the number of patients is too small to clearly define predilection sites that have to be paid attention to when using PFA. Additionally, left atrial substrate is an important problem in patients with recurrent AF despite primarily successful PVI and has to be considered and thoroughly addressed in Re-Do procedures.Reconnection of LSPV and anterior LVAAblation of RSPV and LSPV (posterior)