Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Accurate reservoir characterization is essential for successful hydrocarbon extraction, especially in complex fields such as the Garraf Oil Field. This study aims to enhance reservoir characterization by integrating different petrophysical assessments and rock typing methodologies. Density, neutron, and sonic porosity evaluations were used to assess porosity, while gamma-ray logs and resistivity measurements were used to determine shale volume. The Archie equation was employed to estimate water saturation and sensitivity analysis was used to determine the cutoff values. The study also utilized rock typing techniques, including hydraulic flow unit assessment and Rock fabric number cross-plots, to categorize reservoir rocks into flow units and identify unique rock types. The combination of these approaches led to the precise identification of reservoir heterogeneities and optimal oil production zones. The results showed that the Gamma-ray log is the best method for determining shale volume, and the closest method for porosity determination is the density log. The water resistivity value was estimated at 0.016, while the Archie parameters (a,m,n) were 1.1, 2.1, and 3.7, respectively, with cutoff values of 0.22 for shale volume, 0.11 for porosity, and 0.56 for water saturation. The study identified five rock types ranging from packstone, pack to wackstone, wackstone, wack to mudstone, and mudstone. Overall, the integration of petrophysical evaluations and rock typing techniques facilitates the accurate delineation of oil-rich zones with enhanced reservoir connectivity.
Alrekabi et al. (Tue,) studied this question.