Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
In poetic discourse the aesthetic experience of disruption is significant. Traditionally, to "meet" a poem is to examine its prosody. Intellectual attention to the laws of versification is relevant only if it makes the reader aware of how they contribute to understand the aim of the poem. This paper develops a particular type of reading poetry based on the conceptual meaning of disruption which consists of a number of determinants, such as the division of the whole into parts (Aristotle), freeplay of presence and absence (Derrida), the balance of opposite qualities (Coleridge), the method of transcendence (Emerson), and the embodied mind (Polanyi).
Natalia Pavlivna (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: