Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
In recent decades, space has become a crucial arena in international relations, reshaping geopolitical dynamics due to the increased reliance on data provided by satellite technology and strategic space assets. Globally recognized economic and strategic advantages of space, leading nations to cooperation and competition at the same time. The expanding uses of space for communication, navigation, and surveillance have become increasingly prominent in modern societies. It's undeniable that new missions designed for exploration lead to innovative and sustainable solutions for human expansion in outer space. These missions not only push the boundaries of human knowledge but also offer opportunities for technological advancement and global collaboration. The commercial space industry, primarily propelled by private entities, undeniably plays a pivotal role in advancing space endeavors. In navigating this landscape, it becomes imperative to underscore the significance of robust space security policies. These policies serve as guiding frameworks, delineating principles for responsible and constructive engagement in space activities. While it's essential to recognize that a policy in itself is not a direct security measure, but rather a foundational document outlining objectives and principles, it sets the stage for implementing security measures and fostering technological advantages. Traditionally, deterrence theories focused on terrestrial domains including the nuclear dimension, but the unique characteristics of space demand a paradigm shift. The article introduces a novel perspective on space deterrence, emphasizing strategic capabilities, alliances, and a nuanced understanding of potential aggressors. Core components include denial, resilience, and cost imposition strategies. Military strength, alliances, and space-based nuclear assets play roles in conventional and nuclear space deterrence. Dissuading military aggression involves operational concepts, resilience, and strategic costs. Shaping aggressor thinking requires perception management, confidence-building, and norms. Crafting denial and punishment strategies involves arms control initiatives. Understanding potential aggressors involves assessing motives, aligning interests, and evaluating orbital escalation. The multidimensional nature of space deterrence converges to create a robust framework for dissuading aggression, ensuring a stable and secure celestial environment.
Alper Ören (Sat,) studied this question.