March 24, 2024Open Access

Differences in Standardized Letter of Evaluation (SLOE) 2.0 Scoring Between Men and Women as well as Under-represented in Medicine and Non-underrepresented in Medicine Applicants

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Author(s): Pandey, Aman; Gore, Kasia; Alvarez, Al'ai; Davis, Teresa; Parsons, Melissa; Krzyzaniak, Sara; Monteiro, Sandra; Hegarty, Cullen; Beardsley, Thomas; Bord, Sharon; Gottlieb, Michael; Mannix, Alexandra

Read Full Paperexternally

Bookmark

View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pandey et al. (Sun,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e7296db6db6435876a3b4a https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.20395

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1Comparing the Standardized Letter of Evaluation (SLOE) 2.0 with SLOE for Non-residency-based EM Physicians2024
2Describing Preliminary Data on Scoring Using the Standardized Letter of Evaluation (SLOE) 2.0 Format2024
3Home vs Away Rotation Differences in the Standardized Letters of Evaluation (SLOE) 2.02024
4MP17-09 WERE STANDARDIZED LETTERS OF EVALUATION (SLOE) INVENTED AT LAKE WOBEGON?2024
5Variability in Standardized Letters of Evaluation: A Multi‐Institutional Review of EM Residency Based Versus Non‐Residency Based Faculty Evaluation2026

Bookmark

View Full Paper