Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
In this paper, the absolute static reference frame of the universe is established, the Galileo's relativity principle and the essence of light are analyzed, and the zero result of Michelson-Morey experiment is re-recognized. The conclusion is that the light in two directions reaches the eyepiece at the same time, and when the interferometer is rotated at any angle, the light in two directions still reaches the eyepiece at the same time, and the interference fringes will not move, so the zero result of the experiment is inevitable. This paper analyzes Lorenz's explanation of the zero result of the Michelson-Morey experiment, and points out that there are many contradictions and mistakes in it. Michelson confused the reference frame in his analysis and calculation, and the result was necessarily wrong. The Michelson-Morey experiment wants to measure the speed of the earth relative to the "ether" on the earth. According to the Galileo's relativity principle, it is impossible to measure it. This experiment is meaningless. Because Michelson's wrong calculation result is not consistent with the zero result of the experiment, Lorenz had to set up "length shortening", "clock slowing down" and a Lorenz transformation factor to piece together the zero result of the experiment.It is precisely because these assumptions are incorrect that all the relations and related theories that use Lorentz transformation factors are incorrect, and the special theory of relativity is completely wrong. Only the Galileo's relativity principle can correctly explain the zero result of Michelson-Morey experiment, and the Galileo’s transformation is the correct theory to describes motion. This paper also re-understands the relations among matter, space, time, motion, inertia, field, field wave, force and energy, analyzes the essence of nuclear energy, and establishes a new model of the universe. It makes physics return to the correct track of classical theory and deepens and develops classical theory
Canlun Yuan (Fri,) studied this question.