Youth, caregiver and healthcare professional perspectives on planning the implementation of a trauma‐informed care programme: A qualitative study

Abstract Aims To explore youth, caregiver and staff perspectives on their vision of trauma‐informed care, and to identify and understand potential considerations for the implementation of a trauma‐informed care programme in an inpatient mental health unit within a paediatric hospital. Design and Methods We applied the Interpretive Description approach, guided by complexity theory and the Implementation Roadmap, and used Applied Thematic Analysis methods. Findings Twenty‐five individuals participated in individual or group interviews between March and June 2022, including 21 healthcare professionals, 3 youth and 1 caregiver. We identified two overarching themes. The first theme, ‘Understanding and addressing the underlying reasons for distress’, related to participants’ understanding and vision of TIC in the current setting comprising: (a) ‘Participants’ understanding of TIC’; (b) ‘Trauma screening and trauma processing within TIC’; (c) ‘Taking “a more individualized approach”’; (d) ‘Unit programming’; and (e) “Connecting to the community”. The second theme, ‘Factors that support or limit successful TIC implementation’ comprises: (a) ‘The need for a broad “cultural shift”’; (b) ‘The physical environment on the unit’; and (c) ‘Factors that may limit successful implementation’. Conclusion We identified five key domains to consider within trauma‐informed care implementation: (a) the centrality of engagement with youth, caregivers and staff in trauma‐informed care delivery and implementation, (b) trauma‐informed care core programme components, (c) factors that may support or limit success in implementing trauma‐informed care within the mental health unit and (d) hospital‐wide and (e) the importance of intersectoral collaboration (partnering with external organizations and sectors). Impact When implementing TIC, there is an ongoing need to increase clarity regarding TIC interventions and implementation initiatives. Youth, caregiver and healthcare professional participants shared considerations important for planning the delivery and implementation of trauma‐informed care in their setting. We identified five key domains to consider within trauma‐informed care implementation: (a) the centrality of relational engagement, (b) trauma‐informed care programme components, (c) factors that may support or limit successful implementation of trauma‐informed care within the mental health unit and (d) hospital‐wide and (e) the importance of intersectoral collaboration. Organizations wishing to implement trauma‐informed care should consider ongoing engagement with all relevant knowledge user groups throughout the process. Reporting Method Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR). Patient or Public Contribution The local hospital research institute's Patient and Family Advisory Committee reviewed the draft study methods and provided feedback.