Objective: This study explored the association between low-dose computed tomography (LDCT)-derived body composition and melanoma incidence risk. Methods: LDCT scans from the Pittsburgh Lung Screening Study (n=3,422, 22 follow-up years) were analyzed. Body composition features were segmented and quantified from baseline scans using in-house artificial intelligence algorithms. Features were selected before modeling. Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard models assessed the association between body composition and melanoma incidence. Model performance was evaluated using time-dependent area under the curve (AUC). Restricted mean survival time (RMST) compared melanoma-free survival across BMI and body composition groups at 5, 10, and 15 years. Participants were stratified into risk groups, with risk estimated at each time point. Sex-specific analyses were conducted separately. Statistical significance was defined as p<0.05. Results: Among 3,422 participants, 80 developed melanoma (43 males, 37 females). In the overall model, visceral adipose tissue (VAT) volume (hazard ratio HR=1.27), skeletal muscle (SM) density (HR=0.81), and bone density (HR=1.33) were included, achieving a 21-year AUC of 0.68 (95% CI: 0.65-0.70). The male-specific model included only SM density (HR=0.74; AUC=0.67, 95% CI: 0.65-0.68). The female-specific model (AUC=0.68, 95% CI: 0.65-0.71) included VAT volume (HR=1.47), intramuscular adipose tissue (IMAT) ratio (HR=0.67), and bone density (HR=1.75). Higher VAT, IMAT volume, and lower SM density showed shorter melanoma-free survival and stratified risk better than BMI. Males exhibited higher estimated risk than females. Conclusion: LDCT-derived body composition metrics may provide incidental insights into melanoma risk during lung cancer screening, though their predictive utility remains limited and warrants further investigation.
Yu et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: