Integrating heterogeneous and multilingual geoscience texts into coherent knowledge graphs is challenged by semantic inconsistencies from terminology variations, diverse expressions, and data heterogeneity, hindering the construction of reliable mineral exploration knowledge systems. We propose a semantic-aware fusion framework that enables consistent and sustainable integration of mineral exploration knowledge. Built on a standardized geological knowledge schema defining core entities and their interrelations, the framework incorporates an incremental update paradigm via a schema-guided fusion mechanism that detects and resolves semantic conflicts while preserving provenance for traceable evolution. Evaluated on textual sources, the framework achieves an overall triple extraction F1-score of 0.82. Notably, for the critical task of entity extraction, it attains an F1-score of 0.88, outperforming BERT-BiLSTM and BERT-BiLSTM-CRF baselines by up to 11 points. Precision for key metallogenic elements exceeds 0.90. It identifies 1432 conflicts during fusion and generates a refined knowledge graph of 18,204 high-quality de-duplicated triples, retaining 87.3% of inputs. The resulting graph supports downstream applications, including case analysis, visualization, question answering, and mineral prospectivity prediction. Unlike conventional aggregation approaches, this work treats knowledge fusion as a semantically guided dynamic process, enhancing consistency, transparency, and adaptability. It provides a practical pathway toward intelligent and sustainable geoscience knowledge infrastructures.
A Thu, study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: