Optimizing field cropping practices to improve nitrogen use efficiency is imperative to promote intensive and sustainable wheat production. As a cultivation method commonly adopted in arid and semi-arid regions globally, the ridge–furrow mulching system (RFMS) is capable of efficiently harvesting rainfall, reduce evaporation losses, enhancing soil moisture levels in the root zone, and boosting crop productivity. However, the combined effects of varying ridge–furrow ratios (RD), ridge heights (RH), and nitrogen application rates (RN) on nitrogen fertilizer bias productivity (PFPN) under the influence of climatic conditions, soil types, and field management practices remain poorly understood due to a lack of systematic evaluation. This study conducted a meta-analysis of 462 comparative datasets from 98 research projects to reveal the interactive effects of RFMS and nitrogen fertilizer across climatic gradients. The results showed that RH, RD, and RN increased by 23.78%, 22.37%, and 23.07% respectively (p 200 kg∙hm−2, with PFPN increasing by 27.7%, 29.50%, and 29.32% respectively (p 200 has the best effect on nitrogen utilization efficiency, while under the condition of AE > 1500, RN < 100 is more effective. In terms of mulching strategy, full mulching of ridges and furrows is recommended in areas with severe drought and low temperatures, while mulching only ridges or furrows is more appropriate in areas with relatively mild climate. The present study provides a scientific basis for the optimal design of ridge–furrow mulching configuration and nitrogen application level. This is achieved by considering climatic conditions, soil fertility, and field management in agro-ecosystems in arid and semi-arid areas.
Pan et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: