Background: Food allergy is a leading cause of severe allergic reactions in children and often results in restrictive elimination diets. The oral food challenge (OFC) remains the diagnostic gold standard but is resource-intensive and carries a risk of adverse reactions. This study aimed to identify epidemiological, clinical, and laboratory predictors of OFC outcomes and reaction severity in children with suspected immediate-type food allergies. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of 148 children who underwent hospital-based, open OFCs due to suspected immediate-type food reactions. Data on demographics, comorbidities, characteristics of the initial reaction, sensitisation profiles (specific IgE sIgE, skin prick test SPT), and OFC outcomes were analysed. Reactions were graded using the Ring and Messmer scale. Results: OFC was positive in 44 of 148 children (29.7%). However, no clinical or laboratory parameters—including prior reaction severity and the magnitude of allergy test results—were associated with the severity of reactions during OFC. Comorbidities—specifically asthma, atopic dermatitis, and allergic rhinitis—were significantly associated with a positive OFC (p < 0.01), as were elevated sIgE levels and larger SPT wheal diameters (p < 0.01 for both). The optimal thresholds for predicting a positive OFC were 0.73 IU/mL for sIgE and 3.5 mm for SPT. Conclusions: Oral food challenge (OFC) remains essential for confirming food allergies in children. Given that the severity of reactions during OFCs cannot be reliably predicted and that low cut-off values of allergy tests were identified for predicting a positive OFC outcome, OFCs should be performed in a controlled and fully equipped medical setting, particularly in children with atopic comorbidities.
Berce et al. (Tue,) studied this question.