ABSTRACT The Indo‐Pacific Economic Framework for Prosperity (IPEF) is an unconventional economic initiative in that it excludes tariff reductions and market access. Instead, it focuses on trade, supply‐chain resilience, sustainability, and fair practices. However, without conventional trade incentives, the IPEF may struggle to secure long‐term commitment for costly reforms, which is a paradox that requires some significant unraveling. This study contributes to the search for solutions to the paradox by attempting to apply the Theory of Inventive Problem Solving (TRIZ) to resolve this contradiction. TRIZ identifies and addresses conflicts within systems by balancing opposing objectives. In the context of the IPEF, the challenge is incorporating trade incentives to enhance commitment without undermining its non‐traditional design. Using TRIZ's “engineering contradiction” approach, the study proposes four innovative solutions by strengthening the IPEF's effectiveness while preserving its unique structure. The findings offer strategic insights to ensure sustained engagement and drive inclusive economic growth in the Indo‐Pacific region.
Gan et al. (Thu,) studied this question.