Longer heat acclimation (HA) protocols more effectively improve physical performance than shorter ones, but the effect of HA duration on cognitive performance remains unclear. Twelve participants performed a 45-min cycling heat stress test (HST) 40%Wmax; 40°C; 50% RH on the first (HST1), seventh (HST7), and thirteenth (HST13) day of testing with five consecutive days of isothermic HA (60-min; rectal temperature ~38.5°C) between each HST. Simple (five-choice reaction time RT) and complex (spatial working memory SWM) tests were completed before and after each HST. Reaction and Movement times were slower before HST13 than HST1. Fewer errors were made in the SWM test before HST13 in the 6- (0.0v2.7), 8- (1.8v7.6) and 12- (18v31) box tests and before HST7 in the 6- and 8-box tests (1.9v7.6) compared to HST1. Search strategy was improved before HST7 (4.5v6.8) and HST13 (4.3v6.8). Fewer errors were made in the 8-box test after HST7 (1.6v8.8) and HST13 (1.1v8.6). No other differences were observed (p > 0.05). HA improved performance in some of the more challenging tasks but had no effect on the most complex task (12-box) when physiological strain was highest. 10-days of HA was more effective than 5-days at improving some aspects of cognitive performance.
Moss et al. (Wed,) studied this question.