Background/Objectives: Radiotherapy of the chest wall after mastectomy frequently leads to fibrosis, reduced tissue elasticity, erythema, pain and chronic skin-related symptoms that complicate reconstructive strategies. Autologous fat grafting has been proposed as a regenerative option for radiation induced soft tissue damage, but clinical data focused on patient-reported symptoms remain limited. The objective of this study was to describe symptomatic and clinical changes after autologous fat grafting in irradiated postmastectomy chest wall tissue. Methods: This pilot observational study included five female patients with a history of mastectomy followed by adjuvant chest wall radiotherapy. All patients underwent a single session of standard autologous fat grafting without adipose derived stem cell enrichment. Patient-reported symptoms, including pruritus, local discomfort, burning sensation and erythema, were recorded preoperatively and at six months using a standardized 0 to 5 scale. Scar pliability was assessed by two experienced physicians using the same scale. Only descriptive statistical analysis was performed. Results: All patients demonstrated lower postoperative symptom scores at six months. Mean reductions were observed for erythema (71.4 percent), burning sensation (61.1 percent) and pruritus (57.1 percent). Local discomfort decreased by 33.3 percent. Mean scar pliability scores increased from 2.2 to 3.2. No postoperative complications, such as infection, fat necrosis or oil cyst formation, were recorded. All patients completed the six month follow up. Conclusions: In this small pilot observational study, autologous fat grafting was well tolerated and associated with descriptive improvement of patient-reported symptoms and scar pliability in irradiated postmastectomy chest wall tissue. These findings suggest a potential symptomatic benefit of fat grafting, while larger studies with objective imaging and histological correlation are required to confirm efficacy and durability.
Bogdan et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: