Abstract Background Robotic-assisted bariatric surgery has emerged as a precise tool in managing obesity, offering potential benefits in recovery and patient satisfaction. However, patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are crucial for evaluating its role in holistic care. This study assesses PROs in robotic sleeve gastrectomy and gastric bypass patients, exploring the clinical and operative advancements in obesity through robotic-assisted bariatric surgery. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 115 patients undergoing robotic bariatric procedures (78 sleeve gastrectomy, 34 gastric bypass, 3 other) at SRS Strasbourg from March 2024 to May 2025. A 17-item questionnaire evaluated satisfaction, recovery time, complications, trust in robotic technology, and qualitative perceptions. Descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and multivariable ordinal logistic regression analyzed associations with demographics and procedure type. Results High satisfaction was reported by 87.8% (101/115) of patients, with 81.7% (94/115) noting clear preoperative explanations. Rapid recovery was evident, with 47.8% (55/115) resuming daily activities within one week. Complications (self-describing) occurred in 13.9% (16/115), mainly gastrointestinal (for example, vomiting), with no significant difference between procedures (χ2 = 0.68, P = 0.41). Trust in robotic technology was strong (83.5% strongly agreed), and 86.1% would recommend it. Ordinal logistic regression revealed younger age (40 years) increased odds of higher satisfaction levels (OR = 2.5, 95% c.i.: 1.5–4.2, P 0.001). Qualitative feedback emphasized minimal scarring, quick recovery, and weight loss benefits, supporting improved diabetes management through enhanced surgical precision. Conclusion Robotic bariatric surgery yields excellent PROs, facilitating faster recovery and high patient trust, which are vital for effective obesity and diabetes management. These findings advocate for integrating robotic technologies into multidisciplinary approaches, to optimize patient-centered outcomes.
Ramar et al. (Thu,) studied this question.