The present study systematically investigates, for the first time, the combined influences of detonator position (top-edge and bottom-edge initiations) and anvil material (steel and sand) on the interfacial microstructure and mechanical performance of explosively welded A1050/AZ31 dissimilar joints. When welding was conducted using a steel anvil with the detonator positioned at the top edge, significant cracking occurred both at the surface and along the weld interface. In contrast, placing the detonator at the bottom edge noticeably reduced these defects. Moreover, the use of a sand anvil nullified these defects by damping the reflecting shockwaves and minimizing vibrations. Hardness measurements revealed substantial increase at the interface under all the conditions, with the highest value observed with the steel anvil. Welds subjected to top-edge detonation showed higher hardness values compared to those of welds subjected to bottom-edge detonation. Overall, the results suggest that sand anvils with bottom-edge detonation provide the optimal weld quality. The rigid steel anvil reflects the shockwave, generating high pressure and velocity at the interface, whereas the sand anvil absorbs a part of the shock energy, suppressing high-magnitude reflections. The position of the detonator influences the propagation dynamics of the detonation wave and the resulting collision velocity, which in turn, affect the interfacial morphology and overall quality of the weld.
Sherpa et al. (Thu,) studied this question.