This research aims to examine the legal institution o f placing the debtor in default from a legal and economic perspective, emphasizing its function in maintaining contractual efficiency and balancing the interests o f the creditor and the debtor. The debtor’s default is portrayed as a dual protection mechanism: on one hand, it enables the preservation o f the contractual relationship and promotes voluntary performance; on the other hand, it protects the creditor’s interests by ensuring timely access to contractual remedies. The study highlights that, in order to secure a coherent interdisciplinary interpretation in the spirit o f the Law and Economics theory, the mechanism o f debtor’s default cannot be examined in isolation, as it operates mainly through relative and absolute presumptions designed to streamline the dynamics o f obligations, as implicitly derived from articles 1522-1523 o f the Romanian Civil Code. The second part o f the paper focuses on the interaction between the debtor’s default and the accelerated maturity o f the claim. From the creditor’s standpoint, both mechanisms may undermine contractual trust and generate uncertainty regarding the likelihood o f claim satisfaction; nevertheless, their normative foundations and legal effects on the contract differ substantially. Accordingly, the study underlines the creditor’s need to identify appropriate legal mechanisms and procedural avenues to achieve the intended outcome - the enforcement o f the debtor’s contractual liability. The general conclusion emphasizes that these institutions operate as instruments for balancing and optimizing the contractual relationship, reconciling the requirements o f legal stability with those o f economic efficiency.
Ungureanu Georgiana (Wed,) studied this question.