“Metrological Closure and Particle Spectrum in the Yin–Yang Model” proposes the YY framework as an auditable constitutive system: instead of treating time as a primitive coordinate and particles as pointlike objects, YY defines the physical regime as discrete processing in the Now (ticks/slips) coupled to a registry domain in Yang, where relaxations, decays, and energetic excess become memory. Within this ontology, a particle is formalized as forced mode + locking; mass is interpreted as the inventory/latency cost of locking, while stability (lifetime) is the ability to maintain synchronization under the discrete clock. Validation is organized as metrological engineering: results are admitted into the “core” of the model only when they arise from an explicit chain from the minimal geometric kit and are accompanied by ledger accounting plus a residual audit (harness tests, ablations of key factors, and anti-cherry-picking batteries on sensitive observables). The SI is treated strictly as a translation layer (I/O), not as a foundation: dimensional constants enter only through declared bridges, preserving the closure logic for dimensionless targets. As a “signature panel” of the metrological closure, the manuscript reports: α = 0. 007297352566842 with +2. 97 ppb, Z₀ = 376. 730313461 Ω with −0. 55 ppb, μ₀ with −0. 05 ppm, ε₀ with +0. 003 ppm, and G = 6. 6741063×10⁻¹¹ with −29 ppm (30-ppm target), using standard references (CODATA / NIST and Particle Data Group). The kernel is then confronted by families (leptons, neutrinos, mesons, baryons, and heavy bosons), with an operational SAFE/META/OVERRUN classification and explicit falsifiability criteria. Selected particle-level outputs reported in this work include the electron g-factor gₑ = 2. 002319311639819 with a +3. 64 ppb residue against NIST, and the neutrino oscillation scales m²₂₁ = 7. 42110^-5\, eV² (-308 ppm, PASS) and m²₃₂ = 2. 30610^-3\, eV² (-5. 67%, watchlist) against Particle Data Group conventions, with m_ = 0. 05732\, eV remaining below the commonly used cosmological bound (<0. 12\, eV). The electroweak sector is summarized by ²W (MS) =0. 2312030 (-73 ppm; PASS), while the ``rupture/top'' criterion is satisfied by ₓ₎ 5. 2510^-25\, s ₇₀₃ 3. 010^-24\, s, supporting the operational claim that the top does not hadronize. At the resonance level, the framework classifies the W/Z as gate-type OVERRUN operators (with characteristic scales mW 80. 37\, GeV, \, W 2. 14\, GeV and mZ 91. 19\, GeV, \, Z 2. 50\, GeV) and the Higgs as a short multi-tick operator (mH 125. 25\, GeV, \, H 3. 7\, MeV).
Leo Carlos Kerber (Sun,) studied this question.